The Hoover Institution Center for Revitalizing American Institutions discussing Redrawing the Rules? Mid-Decade Redistricting and the Future of Elections

The Hoover Institution Center for Revitalizing American Institutions webinar series features speakers who are developing innovative ideas, conducting groundbreaking research, and taking important actions to improve trust and efficacy in American institutions. Speaker expertise and topics span governmental institutions, civic organizations and practice, and the role of public opinion and culture in shaping our democracy. The webinar series builds awareness about how we can individually and collectively revitalize American institutions to ensure our country’s democracy delivers on its promise.

The Hoover Institution's Center for Revitalizing American Institutions invites you to attend Redrawing the Rules? Mid-Decade Redistricting and the Future of Elections on Wednesday October 7, 2026 from 10:00 - 11:30 a.m. PT.

Redistricting is traditionally conducted once every ten years following the census, but in recent years some states have pursued efforts to redraw electoral maps in the middle of the decade. Supporters argue that mid-decade redistricting can correct flawed maps, respond to legal challenges, or better reflect population changes. Critics contend that it can be used as a partisan tool to entrench political power, reduce electoral competition, and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.

This webinar will examine the legal, political, and democratic implications of mid-decade redistricting. What authority do states have to redraw maps outside the traditional redistricting cycle? How common is the practice, and what motivates elected officials to pursue it? Will we see more redistricting in the remaining years of this decade? How might mid-decade redistricting affect representation, electoral outcomes, and public trust in elections? And what are the broader implications for democratic norms and institutional legitimacy?

Join leading scholars and practitioners for a timely discussion of one of the most consequential—and contested—issues shaping the future of American elections.